Guns Don’t Equal Resistance (American Gun Rights Truth)
Many outside America think guns beat tyranny, but the real cost is division, infighting, and powerlessness.
On Chinese internet, some calling the current situation in the US “Cowardly Americans”. This is about American guns: as long as ordinary people have guns, they can stand up to tyranny, hold power hostage, and stage a comeback against the state apparatus. This garbage is regarded as gospel by many, who mock “Americans are too cowardly to resist even with guns” as if a gun is a cheat code for freedom.
But the truth is far harsher. Many people fixate on the tactical level. They focus on “how accurate your shooting is” or “how hard you train” and miss the core. Resistance is not a one-on-one brawl, but a game of power structures, organizational capabilities, and social logic. A gun is never a “resistance shortcut.” It is often an “infighting switch” tearing society apart. It’s not a magic weapon to check power, just a toy manipulated by capital and power.
Today, let’s abandon childish shooting range fantasies, expose the cruel truth behind the American gun rights myth, and shatter the self-delusion that “having a gun means you can resist.”
Check out the latest popular posts here…
I. The Core Function of Guns: Not Resisting Tyranny, But Infighting and Self-Consumption
The biggest misunderstanding is treating American guns as a “protagonist’s golden finger.” It is as if pulling a gun turns an ordinary person into a resistance hero. In reality, guns are mostly used for uglier, more absurd purposes.
American news shows guns are rarely used to “resist tyranny.” They fuel escalated family quarrels, fatal road rage incidents, gang wars, and random shootings. Guns breed community suspicion, turning people into distrustful strangers who dare not communicate.
Ironically, more guns mean a more fragmented society. When guns become “life-saving artifacts,” trust collapses. Neighbors and strangers eye each other warily, and once-united communities fall apart. This “everyone for themselves” state is exactly what the state’s violent apparatus wants.
The state doesn’t need to suppress ordinary people. It just watches them fight and drain each other. Fragmented, hostile individuals can never unite against power, and guns turn people into “loners.” Thinking a gun is a resistance weapon is pure self-delusion.
Those advocating “having a gun means you can resist” are mistaken. Guns don’t organize people; they divide them. They don’t bring freedom; they trap people in deeper fear and infighting.
II. The Key to Resistance: Never Having a Gun, But Uniting and Having a Reasonable Narrative
Arguments about “having a gun to resist” loop pointlessly. One side says “you can’t beat a semi-military organization,” and the other retorts “train more.” But resistance is about organization and reason, not shooting skill.
Take ICE as an example. Its strength lies not in guns, but a closed-loop system: widespread intelligence, omnipresent surveillance, informants, legal cover, seamless cross-state cooperation, and media hype that frames its actions as “protecting national security.”
Facing this system, even skilled shooters acting alone or in disorganized groups will be killed or jailed. Without unity, cooperation, or a plan, a gun is a death warrant.
This is harsh reality. Without unity, a gun is useless. It will only get you killed.
The state’s violent apparatus easily labels scattered armed conflicts as “terrorism” to expand power and round up more people. Those shouting “resist with guns” unknowingly hand power an excuse to oppress more innocent people.
True resistance isn’t “one person with one gun” recklessness. It’s unity, a reasonable narrative, and public support; trade unions, community mutual aid, legal aid, and media exposure. These are far more effective than a gun.
III. The Biggest Joke of the Gun Rights Myth: Anger Is Directed at People Around You, Not at Those in Power
American gun rights peddle the lie that “guns are the last line of defense against tyranny.” Gun owners claim they hold guns to prevent dictatorship, but reality is a massive satire.
Most gun owners never point their guns at power. They avoid corrupt politicians, abusive police, or exploitative tycoons. They target neighbors, strangers, and “imagined enemies.”
Gun owners often lash out at others over trivial slights, even resorting to violence. Poor people fight each other, even shooting over small sums. Gangs resolve conflicts with endless gunfire. Infighting never stops.
The harsh truth: guns make ordinary people vent anger on those around them, draining each other instead of holding power and capital accountable.
This is capital and power’s “domestication tactic.” Promoting gun rights diverts anger to infighting, making the poor blame each other instead of the unfair power structure. This keeps people divided and unaccountable to those exploiting them.
Those hyping “having a gun means you can resist” are manipulated. They think they hold a resistance weapon, but they’re just tools of power and capital, hurting fellow oppressed ordinary people.
IV. The Cost of Resisting Power: Ordinary People Can Never Afford It, It’s Pure Folly
Retorting “train more, buy better gear” to “having a gun means you can resist” is an unrealistic “muscle man fantasy.” Resisting power requires unaffordable costs for ordinary people. It’s pure folly.
Guns and supporting gear (ammunition, protective gear, scopes) are beyond ordinary families. Daily shooting range training is a money pit. Owning a gun carries legal risks. Misuse, even for self-defense, can lead to jail. It also endangers family, job, and social life, risking isolation as a “dangerous person.”
Most Americans are crushed by rent, insurance, and debt. They work endlessly, with no time or money for semi-military training. It’s a fantasy.
Harsh truth: those who can afford long-term gun training and gear are middle-class or connected beneficiaries of the system. They don’t need to “resist tyranny.”
The most exploited poor can barely afford food or rent. Their guns are just consolation toys. Daring to resist power with a gun will get them crushed instantly.
Conclusion: A Gun Is Not the Answer, Unity Is
The “having a gun means you can resist” fairy tale is unrealistic “keyboard heroism.” People hide behind screens, ignoring power’s nature, organization’s importance, and ordinary people’s struggles. They simplify politics into a childish game.
The American gun rights myth is a tragedy of division and self-consumption. Guns bring fear, not freedom. Those hyping gun resistance don’t understand its meaning. They use guns to escape reality, mistaking fantasies for power.
Bluntly: a gun isn’t the answer. Unity and organization are. A society relying on guns for freedom has blocked “people working together.” True freedom comes from unity, cooperation, and reasonable power checks, not a single gun.
If you can’t even hold a meeting to protect your rights, join a union, or attend community meetings, imagining resisting the state with a gun is not courage. It’s childish self-anesthesia.
Thank you.. I have made these arguments for years but they seem to fall on deaf ears among young men. The culture in U.S.A teaches that might makes right and organization and unity are weak solutions but I have hope that those beliefs will not prevail much longer.
Guns do Not mean Equal Resistance. But taking guns away is STILL NOT THE ANSWER! To Many, a gun is the only way to put food on the table. So taking that away is still creating problems. I am not looking at this as a main stream view, I am bringing in an Indigenous view. Most reservations do NOT have access to stores, or have to travel more than 2 hrs away to the nearest grocery store. And anything local costs so much and are extremely bad for you. I have paid $7 for a loaf of cheap white bread many times. Go into grocery stores on a reservation and their vegetable section is abuse 6foot long and about 3foot wide. That's it. There is no 1 size fits all here in the US. Just because the rest of the world has an idea none of you think about the indigenous population.