Start with a claim that sounds soft and turns out to be the hardest thing in the room. Artificial intelligence should belong to the people. Not to a country, not to a company. To people, all of them.
Last week that idea got said out loud on a world stage. In Shanghai, Xi Jinping called AI the common wealth of all mankind. Whether Beijing delivers on that is another matter, and the models and compute over there still sit under the state. But at least the goal got named. The American plan names a different one. It is titled “Winning the Race,” and it means exactly what it says.
Really appreciate you reading this. My contents here are always free, so tell me what you think, and if you want more breakdowns like this one, a free subscribe goes a long way. And if you can support the work a little further than that, honestly it is a real boost of confidence, and it is what keeps this project moving. Either way, thank you for being here.
So before we get to who is paying for what, sit with the question underneath it all. Why should AI serve people in the first place?
Here is why. AI was not conjured out of thin air by a handful of firms in California. It was trained on us. Every model runs on the collective output of billions of human beings, everything we have ever written, drawn, filmed, and figured out, scraped up for free. It runs on public electricity, public water, and decades of publicly funded research, including the internet itself, which your tax money built. AI is the commons, refined and sold back to you. Something built by everyone has a real claim to belong to everyone. That is not sentiment. It is a question of ownership.
Now put it in the line it belongs to. Steam, electricity, the computer, the internet, and now this. None of those were just products. Each was a means of production, a new way to make everything else, and whoever owned it set the terms for everyone who had to work with it. AI belongs on that list for a plain reason. It is a tool you make things with. You write with it, code with it, design and build and plan with it, so it does not just sit in the economy, it multiplies what a single person can produce. And it is being born almost entirely privately owned. So ask the only question that has ever mattered with a leap this size. Do the gains go to the people who do the work, or to whoever owns the machine?
Here is the part the American side will never say out loud. Their problem with “open source,” with “shared,” with calling AI a commons, is not about security, and it is not really about China. It is older than that. Capital does not share the means of production. It never has. So when one government says the machine should be held in common and the other says the whole point is to win, you are not watching two countries compete. You are watching the oldest fight there is, the people who want the tool owned by everyone against the people who intend to own it themselves. On that one, I know which side I am on.
The American plan is capital doing what capital does. A fully American tech stack, exported to allied countries to lock them in. 500 billion dollars aimed at a single private data center campus. A goal, written in plain language, of dominance. You do not need dominance to help people. You need dominance to control them.
And you are already paying to build it, start to finish. The cost starts in the mines that feed the chips and ends in the electronic waste, with the data centers burning public power and water in between. But the costs are not the story. The direction the money moves is. The company takes the profit. The public eats the cost, socialized onto people who will never own a share of what they are subsidizing. That is the machine in four words. Privatized gain, socialized cost. People on one side, the data center on the other.
Congress has a bill that is supposed to fix this, and it tells you everything. It has not passed. It only asks states to consider making big electricity users pay their own way, and states are free to say no. Even the protection is built to be optional. The tech giants back that toothless version happily, because a fix that fixes nothing costs them nothing, while the versions with real teeth die quietly. The public pays. The private owner keeps the machine.
So here is where it lands. AI is the compressed knowledge and labor of the entire species, a means of production built by all of us, and a thing like that has no business ending up as the private property of a few dozen corporations. Serving people and seeking dominance were never two roads to the same place. The American system picked one on purpose.
We share this world. We built its knowledge together, over thousands of years, and AI is stacked on top of all of it. A tool that came from everyone should answer to everyone, and it should not be split up by class any more than the air is. Anything less is theft dressed up as innovation.
