7 Comments
User's avatar
Sam Hai's avatar

Oh I cannot wait to see the Americans comment on your RedNote and YouTube

Expand full comment
pebbles's avatar

Excellent read! Im your friend on TikTok and love your common sense. Thank you!!

Expand full comment
Neil Zhu's avatar

Thank you Pebbles!!!!! Thanks for the following!

Expand full comment
Lisa Mendoza's avatar

Keeping an open mind but coming from Tulsi hard to believe. How do you know it’s real?

Expand full comment
Neil Zhu's avatar

Hard to tell, but at least half of the country believe her. It’s a narrative they trying to create, that’s what matters

Expand full comment
Lisa Mendoza's avatar

True. I enjoy your Substack. Thank you

Expand full comment
sylviagee's avatar

No! You are doing the same as Tulsi has deliberately done! You are conflating the findings of two different things.

One report said Russia did not interfere with the machines that count votes, or the vote totals. No physical evidence. So no credible interference from Russians with vote counting.

What then came out was the definite and provable Russian interference in propaganda against Hilary, by such as hacking emails, and by feeding false social media stories. So yes, definite and credible interference in that area.

Do not inflate the two investigations with their two different outcomes.

One relating to physical interference in vote counting.

The other disinformation and propaganda bought and paid for by Russia.

Expand full comment