Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vegandytn34's avatar

It’s also an effective method of control: people whose housing is tied into a loan must maintain their income level to be able to afford to keep that home and interest rates can be used to threaten that and make it more difficult. One of the main ways to bring about positive change is to withdraw one’s labour by going on strike, but then there is no income and the system is designed to make you homeless when that happens. Hence people cannot afford to take action without the threat of losing their housing. This obviously applies to renting too and in both instances people are at the mercy of those who own either the debt or the building. Banks and corporate landlords are only interested in profit, so most people are tied into the system unless they have paid off their mortgage- therefore the longer it runs, the more control they have. Also, the decreasing US life span (due to the appalling US diet which is heavy in animal product and highly processed fatty, sugar laden products and low in essential fiber), most people won’t live long enough to pay a 50 year mortgage off, will die in debt and the banks will seize the housing.

Expand full comment
Alan Forrest Imhoff's avatar

Build more housing competently, and revive / restore existing housing. Expel hedge fund money from the process. Use public funds; implement public policy, like, for instance: "Thou shalt not build / fix up this building with public subsidy without a solar generative roof

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?